Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software directory traversal – Digitalmunition

Exploit/Advisories Cybersecurity study of the dark web exposes vulnerability to machine identities -- ScienceDaily

Published on August 8th, 2019 📆 | 7863 Views ⚑


Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software directory traversal

CVSS Meta Temp ScoreCurrent Exploit Price (≈)

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (the affected version is unknown). This vulnerability affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a directory traversal vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-22. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality.

The weakness was published 08/08/2019 as cisco-sa-20190807-nfv-read as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is available at This vulnerability was named CVE-2019-1960 since 12/06/2018. Local access is required to approach this attack. The successful exploitation requires a single authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not available.

Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.

Similar entry is available at 139689.



VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.2

VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍


VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Class: Directory traversal (CWE-22)
Local: Yes
Remote: No

Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒

Threat Intelligenceinfoedit

Threat: 🔍
Adversaries: 🔍
Geopolitics: 🔍
Economy: 🔍
Predictions: 🔍
Remediation: 🔍Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔒

12/06/2018 CVE assigned
08/08/2019 +245 days Advisory disclosed
08/08/2019 +0 days VulDB entry created
08/08/2019 +0 days VulDB last updateVendor:

Advisory: cisco-sa-20190807-nfv-read
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2019-1960 (🔒)
See also: 🔒

Created: 08/08/2019 07:00 PM
Complete: 🔍


No comments yet. Please log in to comment.

Upgrade your account now!

Tagged with:

Leave a Reply