Linux Kernel up to 4.10 net/rds/af_rds.c rds_recv_track_latency memory corruption – Digitalmunition

Exploit/Advisories Cybersecurity study of the dark web exposes vulnerability to machine identities -- ScienceDaily

Published on August 20th, 2019 📆 | 4139 Views ⚑


Linux Kernel up to 4.10 net/rds/af_rds.c rds_recv_track_latency memory corruption

CVSS Meta Temp ScoreCurrent Exploit Price (≈)

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Linux Kernel up to 4.10 (Operating System). This issue affects the function rds_recv_track_latency of the file net/rds/af_rds.c. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability (Out-of-Bounds). Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

The weakness was published 08/19/2019. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2017-18552 since 08/18/2019. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 08/19/2019).

Upgrading to version 4.11 eliminates this vulnerability.

Similar entries are available at 140286, 140284, 140283 and 140282.




VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.5
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3

VulDB Base Score: ≈5.5
VulDB Temp Score: ≈5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Class: Memory corruption / Out-of-Bounds (CWE-119)
Local: Yes
Remote: No

Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒

Threat Intelligenceinfoedit

Threat: 🔍
Adversaries: 🔍
Geopolitics: 🔍
Economy: 🔍
Predictions: 🔍
Remediation: 🔍Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔒

Upgrade: Kernel 4.11

08/18/2019 CVE assigned
08/19/2019 +1 days Advisory disclosed
08/19/2019 +0 days VulDB entry created
08/19/2019 +0 days VulDB last updateVendor:
CVE: CVE-2017-18552 (🔒)
See also: 🔒Created: 08/19/2019 08:22 AM
Complete: 🔍

Download the whitepaper to learn more about our service!

Tagged with:

Leave a Reply ✍